TEAM CONTRIBUTION EVALUATION FORM

EVALUATOR
Date:
( required )
@psu.edu ( required )
( required )
( required )
TEAM MEMBERS

Evaluate your team members only.
Rank your team members starting with #1 for the best team member.
#1:
#2:
#3:
#4:
#5:

INSTRUCTIONS

When filling out this form, you are expected to provide MEANINGFUL and FAIR evaluation of other team's product.
Your individual grade will also reflect how well you accomplish your evaluations.

EVALUATIONS
Cooperation

In what way did the team member cooperate or not cooperate with the team?

Team Member #1:


Team Member #2:


Team Member #3:


Team Member #4:


Team Member #5:
Communication

Did the team member stay in touch with the team while developing his / her part of the project / report?
Did the team member give the team timely and periodic updates on the status of the development of his / her part of the project / report?

Team Member #1:


Team Member #2:


Team Member #3:


Team Member #4:


Team Member #5:
Collaboration

In what way did the team member work well or did not work well with other members of the team?
Was there willingness to work with another or any of the team members?

Team Member #1:


Team Member #2:


Team Member #3:


Team Member #4:


Team Member #5:
Respect

In what way was the team member respectful or not respectful in his / her dealings with other members of the team?
Was he / she willing and did he / she listen to other member's ideas.
How were ideas from other members received?

Team Member #1:


Team Member #2:


Team Member #3:


Team Member #4:


Team Member #5:
Professionalism

In what way was the part of the project / report produced by the team member professionally or not professionally done?
In what way was the the team member professional in his / her approach to the project?

Team Member #1:


Team Member #2:


Team Member #3:


Team Member #4:


Team Member #5:
Conscientious

In what way was the team member conscientious or not conscientious in his / her effort to help the team determine the best approach to solving the problem
as well as in learning the material needed for the successful design of the project / report?

Team Member #1:


Team Member #2:


Team Member #3:


Team Member #4:


Team Member #5:
Integrity

Did the team member genuinely care about the integrity of the final product?
Was the team member thorough in his / her analysis and design or did he / she intentionally overlook some aspects?

Team Member #1:


Team Member #2:


Team Member #3:


Team Member #4:


Team Member #5:
Team

Given the choice, would you have this person as part of your team again, say in a new project / report?
Why or why not?

Team Member #1:


Team Member #2:


Team Member #3:


Team Member #4:


Team Member #5:
Comments

Any additional meaningful comments regarding your team members:

Team Member #1:


Team Member #2:


Team Member #3:


Team Member #4:


Team Member #5:
TEAM GRADES

Based on your comments above, what overall meaningful grade do you think this team member deserves for his / her part of this project / report?

Team Member A A– B+ B B– C+ C C– D+ D F
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
YOUR GRADE
Your grade for group work will be made up of the following:
15% = the average of the team evaluations by your team members
15% = the average of the group product evaluations by other teams
70% = instructor's assessment which includes how you evaluate your team members and other teams

© 1999-03-02 cpsm; last update 2007-03-01 9:03